A Full Tummy Tuck (With or Without Circumferential Extension) Will Best Correct the Upper Belly and Bellybutton

I've lost 100 lbs. after having a Lap Band put in nearly 4 years ago.  My stomach issues are very unique looking, which is why I'm having the difficulty in determining what procedure I need.  My unwanted fat and loose skin are mainly only above the bellybutton, like they're sitting on a shelf.  I am unsure of which procedure would benefit me the most between simple liposuction, a modified Tummy Tuck, a full Tummy Tuck, or extended.  I'm open to any other suggestions as well.  I believe my skin has shrunk back as much as it can already.  Thoughts?

First and foremost, congratulations on your weight loss! What a wonderful transformation. In addition to your improved health, your figure already looks terrific.

Second, even though you might think that your tummy has "unique" issues, nothing could be further from reality. I see at least one patient per week whose tummy looks like yours.

Third, go for a full tummy tuck.

• After 4 years, your skin is not going to shrink on its own any farther--no matter how much exercise you do.
• Liposuction will not be helpful to treat the upper tummy and bellybutton. Since liposuction is a fat removal technique (without any significant skin tightening), liposuction is the wrong answer. You are already skinny!  The problem is too much skin without good tone, not excess fat.
• Mini tummy tucks are nonsense operations. I have never found the right patient for a mini tummy tuck--even after 8 years of practice!  A mini tummy tuck is for that very rare patient whose problem area is limited to her lower middle abdomen, just above her pubis. Obviously, this is not where you are concerned.
• A standard tummy tuck will work. To minimize "dog ear" formation on the bilateral hips, weight-loss patients generally get their best results when the tummy tuck is extended all the way around circumferentially. Whether you choose to keep the surgery just in the front or all the way around will be your decision. Both are good choices, but the circumferential technique generally produces better contours.
• Do not do a fleur-di-lis abdominoplasty. The vertical portion of the scar is ugly, and the operation is now recognized as obsolete. If any doctor offers you this surgery, run away!  He is out of date!!

Fourth, make sure that your lap band port is exchanged from a high-profile to a low-profile. Now that you are thin, the low-profile port will be less visible. You don't need that extra prominence to find the port anyway; you've got no subcutaneous fat. (Congratulations again!)

Fifth, make sure that your surgeon is certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. And, better yet, research whether he specializes in weight-loss patients. I do a lot of post-bariatric contouring, and let me tell you that weight-loss patients are very different from "regular" plastic surgery patients. Your surgeon needs the expertise only garnered from years of experience with your peer group.

Good luck!

Spend Your Health Savings Accounts on Plastic Surgery - Only 2 1/2 Months Left

asdf

ads

fasd

fa

sdf

Most cafeteria plans offer two different flexible spending accounts; one is for qualified medical expenses and the other is for dependent care expenses. A few cafeteria plans offer other types of FSAs, especially if the employer also offers an HSA. Participation in one type of FSA does not affect participation in another type of FSA, but funds cannot be transferred from one FSA to another.

[edit] Medical expense FSA

The most common type of FSA is used to pay for medical expenses not paid for by insurance; this usually means deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance for the employee's health plan, but may also include expenses not covered by the health plan, such as dental and vision expenses and over-the-counter drugs including a first aid kit. A medical FSA cannot pay for health insurance premiums, cosmetic items, cosmetic surgery, controlled substances (in violation of federal law), or items that improve "general health". All items must be intended to treat or prevent a specific medical condition; this can be as significant as diabetes or pregnancy, or as trivial as skin cuts. Generally, allowable items are the same as those allowable for the medical tax deduction, as outlined in IRS publication 502.

The annual caps for a medical FSA varies by employer. Unlike dependent care FSAs, there is no IRS cap on medical FSAs, but employers generally limit the annual amount each employee may contribute,^[1] in order to reduce the risk of pre-funding. Should the employee leave or be terminated and thus no longer pay in to the plan, the employer does not recapture their pre-funding from the employee's payroll deduction.

Flexible Spending Accounts debit card allows for the automatic electronic transfer of pre-tax dollars from an employee account when paying for qualified expenses. Employees are able to receive immediate reimbursement of their medical, dependent care, and commuter expenses simply by using their card at the point of service. The normal paper claims process is eliminated, as are worries of forgotten purchases or lost receipts.

[edit] Plan year grace period

In 2005, the Internal Revenue Service authorized an optional 2½ month grace period that employers can use in their plans, allowing use of the funds for 2½ months after the end of the plan year.

[edit] Use it or lose it

One major drawback is that the money must be spent within the coverage period as defined by the benefits cafeteria plan coverage definition. This coverage period is usually defined as the period that you are covered under the cafeteria plan during the "plan year". The "plan year" is commonly defined as the calendar year.

Any money that is left unspent at the end of the coverage period is forfeited back to the company; this is commonly known as the "use it or lose it" rule. It should be noted and called out for emphasis that under most plans your "coverage period" generally ceases upon termination of your employment whether initiated by you or your employer unless you continue coverage with the company under COBRA or other arrangement. An unfortunate possibility, especially in the case of unexpected, immediate layoff, is that should you have unused contributions in your FSA and no additional qualifying claims during your coverage period you will have the added insult of "losing" these funds. On the other hand, if the payroll taxes saved on the employee's contributions exceeds the amount the employee forfeited, then the employee has still saved money overall.

A second requirement is that all applications for refunds must be made by a date defined by the plan. If funds are forfeited, this does not eliminate the requirement to pay taxes on these funds if such taxes are required. For example, if a single person elects to withhold $5000 for child care expenses and gets married to a non-working spouse, the $5000 would become taxable. If this person did not submit claims by the required date, the $5000 would be forfeited but taxes would still be owed on the amount.

Also, the annual contribution amount must remain the same throughout the year unless certain qualifying events occur, such as the birth of a child or death of a spouse.

No Insurance Company Will Pay for a Tummy Tuck

I have a PPO.  How can I get my insurance company to pay for a tummy tuck?  Or will I have to pay for it out of pocket?

-Andy in Ventura, California

Dear Andy,

I think that you are confusing 2 separate procedures:

• panniculectomy
• abdominoplasty

A panniculectomy is a functional procedure for removing excess skin and fat.  An insurance company MAY authorize a panniculectomy if...

• The apron of excess abdominal skin impedes walking.
• The apron of excess abdominal skin impedes normal groin hygiene.
• There are recalcitrant fungal infections beneath the skin folds.
• The fungal infections have progressed to bacterial infections, necessitating hospitalization and IV antibiotics.

A panniculectomy is NOT an attractive operation.  The goal is function, not cosmesis.

• There is no tailoring of the skin excess.
• There is no liposuction to contour the flanks.
• The bellybutton is not preserved.
• The muscles are not tightened.
• The abdomen is not optimally flattened.

If your goals are functional, then you should consider a panniculectomy.  Find a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon who accepts your insurance, and then speak with him/her frankly.

If, however, your goals are to have a more attractive torso, then you are looking for an abdominoplasty, better known as a tummy tuck.  An abdominoplasty will take care of everything that a panniculectomy will, but it will also do more....

• The extra skin and fat (that creates the "apron" and/or the "roll") will be removed.
• The skin will be pulled taut, and will be tailored to your frame.
• The bellybutton is reconstructed and rejuvenated.
• The "six-pack" muscles are tightened.
• The abdomen is flattened.
• Often, some liposuction is done on the flanks to optimize the waist.

Obviously, no insurance company is going to pay for you to look cuter.  Medical insurance is supposed to help defray medical expenses.  An unattractive belly is not a medical problem; it is an aesthetic issue.  So, an abdominoplasty would be your financial responsibility.

There is one more caveat:  Sometimes, a patient suffers medical problems from an abdominal "apron."  Moreover, he/she wants not only functional relief but also aesthetic improvement.  In this circumstance, the surgeon can help the patient obtain authorization for a panniculectomy.  The patient might then pay the difference for a full tummy tuck.  In effect, the patient is getting the best of both worlds:  functional improvement (covered by the insurance company) and cosmetic enhancement.  Check out this example below...

 

Breast Implants: Consideration #9: Complications

Are you willing to accept potential complications

asdf

asdf

asdf

poor scarring, bleeding, infection, malposition, asymmetry, capsular contracture, finite life span of implants, wrong size

Breast Implants: Consideration #8: Adjunctive Procedures? Lift Up? Lipo?

Adjunctive procedures

lipo of the anterior axilla or armpits or water wings

lift up

change shape, such as for constricted breasts

Breast Implants: Consideration #7: Size

not to exceed your body's frame

not to exceed your skin's elasticity

enough to fill the envelope

err on the bigger side

Volumes to go up by a size

32 250

34 300

36 350

38 400

40 ?

Gel is smaller than saline by 8%; go for bigger for gel

 

short, medium, or high profile

Breast Implants: Consideration #6: Position of Implants - Above or Below Muscle

 

asd

f

 

• Subglandular implant:  The prosthesis is placed under the breast tissue but on top of the pectoralis major muscle.
• Subpectoral implant (or submuscular implant):  The prosthesis is placed behind the pectoralis major muscle (which is itself behind the breast gland).

Obviously, Holly, you deserve a customized evaluation, and only then can a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon help you make the best decision.  Nevertheless, there are some general advantages and disadvantages of the two options....

Subglandular Implants

Advantages:

• Technically easier operation for the surgeon
• Can be placed without general anesthesia (without going totally to sleep)
• Larger implants can be accomodated
• Potentially, more cleavage can be created
• No surgery on the muscle; therefore, less discomfort
• No surgery on the muscle; therefore, faster recovery time
• More "lift" effect, so that formal breast up-lift operations can be avoided

Disadvantages

• The "look" tends to be more artificial and less natural
• More rippling
• Greater likelihood of capsular contracture
• More difficult to interpret mammograms

Subpectoral Implants

Advantages

• Usually, a more natural breast appearance
• Less rippling
• Lower risk of capsular contracture
• More successful mammogram readings

Disadvantages

• More difficult operation
• Requires general anesthesia
• Can not always produce as much cleavage as the patient might desire
• More discomfort
• Longer recovery time
• Among women with large pectoralis majors, muscle contraction can distort the implant

Practically speaking, I try to convince most of my patients here in Ventura, California (>90%) to undergo subpectoral placements.  The unusual exceptions...

• Extreme fear of general anesthesia
• Very low pain tolerance
• Looking for a "fake" look
• High performance athletes, whose pectoralis major muscles should not be altered
• Body builders, in whom muscle flexion would distort their breasts during competitions
• Male-to-female transsexuals, whose large XY pectoralis major muscles would not accomodate a subpectoral implant

I like saline implants above the muscle when the patient...

• ...already has a fair amount of breast tissue.
  • Saline implants tend to ripple more than silicone.
  • Hence, those implants need some sort of coverage to camouflage that rippling.
  • That coverage can come from the muscle or from breast tissue.
  • If a woman's breasts are already big, but she would like them even bigger, placing implants on top of the muscle is usually OK.
• ...wants the most natural results when she exercises (nearly) naked(!)
  • The breasts are naturally on top of the muscles.
  • Therefore, if the muscles move, the overlying breasts shouldn't move that much.
  • However, if the implants are beneath the muscles, the breasts might move unnaturally when the muscles contract.
  • Since most women don't exercise naked, this is a minor issue for most patients.
  • Nevertheless, some women do compete in sports in small bikinis, and they are aware of breast distortions with shoulder/chest muscle contractions (such as beach volleyball players, surfers, body builders...see below)
• ...is a body builder.
  • Body builders have very well developed muscles.
  • Contraction of those big muscles would significantly distort the positions of sub-muscular implants.
  • These women do pose nearly naked (in small bikinis) while flexing their muscles.
  • Even though these women do not have a lot of body fat, implants on top of the muscle are generally better.
  • In competitions, the rippling of the implants looks less bad than implant distortion.
• ...has droopy breasts and prefers to avoid formal lift-up procedures
  • Implants themselves provide breast rejuvenation.
  • The muscles tend to mute the rejuvenative/lift-up effects of breast augmentations.
  • Even though many women need mastopexies (lift-up surgeries) at the same time as their augmentations, some patients prefer to avoid the additional scars of mastopexies and accept the limitations of implants on top of the muscles.
• ...is looking for a quicker recovery
  • Most breast implants surgeries do not require a long recovery.
  • However, positioning of the implants below the muscle is more uncomfortable.
  • Staying on top of the muscle is much less painful.

Generally, I use silicone implants when patients choose to have their augmentations on top of the muscle.  Or, better yet, I place implants beneath the muscle in 90% of circumstances...

• to minimize rippling
• to reduce excess scar tissue around the implants (known as capsular contracture)

• Subglandular implant:  The prosthesis is placed under the breast tissue but on top of the pectoralis major muscle.
• Subpectoral implant (or submuscular implant):  The prosthesis is placed behind the pectoralis major muscle (which is itself behind the breast gland).

Obviously, Holly, you deserve a customized evaluation, and only then can a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon help you make the best decision.  Nevertheless, there are some general advantages and disadvantages of the two options....

Subglandular Implants

Advantages:

• Technically easier operation for the surgeon
• Can be placed without general anesthesia (without going totally to sleep)
• Larger implants can be accomodated
• Potentially, more cleavage can be created
• No surgery on the muscle; therefore, less discomfort
• No surgery on the muscle; therefore, faster recovery time
• More "lift" effect, so that formal breast up-lift operations can be avoided

Disadvantages

• The "look" tends to be more artificial and less natural
• More rippling
• Greater likelihood of capsular contracture
• More difficult to interpret mammograms

Subpectoral Implants

Advantages

• Usually, a more natural breast appearance
• Less rippling
• Lower risk of capsular contracture
• More successful mammogram readings

Disadvantages

• More difficult operation
• Requires general anesthesia
• Can not always produce as much cleavage as the patient might desire
• More discomfort
• Longer recovery time
• Among women with large pectoralis majors, muscle contraction can distort the implant

Practically speaking, I try to convince most of my patients here in Ventura, California (>90%) to undergo subpectoral placements.  The unusual exceptions...

• Extreme fear of general anesthesia
• Very low pain tolerance
• Looking for a "fake" look
• High performance athletes, whose pectoralis major muscles should not be altered
• Body builders, in whom muscle flexion would distort their breasts during competitions
• Male-to-female transsexuals, whose large XY pectoralis major muscles would not accomodate a subpectoral implant

Breast Implants: Consideration #5: Location of Incision

There are four commonly used incisions for breast augmentations.

1. Inframammary fold - a gently curved incision in the fold beneath the breast
2. Periareolar - a semicircular incision around the lower half of the areola
3. Transaxillary - a straight incision in an armpit crease
4. Transumbilical - a curved incision in the upper half of the umblicus

According to a recent study published in the Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Board Certified Plastic Surgeons in the USA prefer the inframammary fold and periareolar approaches.  The actual percentages of Board Certified Plastic Surgeons who prefer a particular approach...

1. Inframammary fold - 64%
2. Periareolar - 25%
3. Transaxillary - 8.7%
4. Transumbilical - 0.4%

Why is the inframammary approach most popular?

• Most versatile:  Any type of implant (saline or silicone, round or tear drop, smooth or textured, small or large) can be placed through this incision.  The inframammary approach allows access into either of the available pockets (under the breast or under the breast + muscle).
• Useful for secondary surgery:  Hopefully, you will not need a second (or third) surgery.  However, most implants will not last the lifetime of a women undergoing primary breast augmentations in her 30s.  She should plan on additional procedures.  The inframammary incision can be reused again and again for replacements of implants, corrections of problems, etc.
• Excellent precision:  Because the incision is directly beneath the breast, the surgeon can see what he is doing.  Any bleeding can be immediately stopped.  The pocket domain can be precisely controlled.  There is no need for guesswork.
• Distant from nerves and milk ducts:  Because the inframammary incision is away from nerves and milk ducts, there should (theoretically) be a decreased incidence of nipple numbness and fewer difficulties with subsequent breast feeding.  Moreover, since milk ducts may contain bacteria, remaining distant to bacteria may reduce a patient's risk of infection.
• Good aesthetics:  Inframammary scars tend to heal well; scars rarely hypertrophy (become thick and raised).  Moreover, since an attractive breast has a subtle "hang," the mound should itself obscure the resultant scar.  At the minimum, the inframammary scar should fall within the shadow of the breast.
• Limitations:  Very, very few.
• • Rare patients may have so little natural breast tissue that they don't really have folds; these patients may benefit from another approach.
  • Constricted breasts may be better treated with periareolar incisions.  (Constricted breasts are tight breasts with little tissue other than immediately behind the areolae.)
  • Others may object to the scar, but they must remember that the other scars (periareolar, transaxillary, and transumbilical) may be more advantageous only in the short term.  If those patients need secondary surgery, they are probably going to end up with inframammary incisions anyway.  Then, they have two sets of scars. 

Why is the periareolar incision also frequently used?

• Somewhat versatile:  Many types of implants can be placed through this incision; however, large silicone implants cannot always be placed through small areolae.  Tear-drop-shaped implants may be difficult to maneuver through small areolae too.  Both the subglandular and subpectoral pockets can be created through this incision.
• Particularly useful for constricted/tubular breasts:  The areola can be reduced in size at the same time.
• Can be useful for some secondary surgeries:  Some secondary surgeries can be performed through this approach.  However, on other occasions, the surgeon must convert to an inframammary technique.
• Excellent precision:  Like the inframammary incision, the periareolar approach allows for great control and precision.
• Good aesthetics:  Periareolar scars may be somewhat invisible.  For maximum camouflage, some plastic surgeons advocate tattooing any visible scars with ink similar in color to the patient's natural areolae.
• Limitations:  Some.  But this is still a useful technique.
• • If the patient has small areolae, then the periareolar incisions may not allow for placements of large silicone implants or tear-drop-shaped implants.
  • Some secondary surgeries may still require an inframammary approach.
  • Periareolar incisions may be more likely to damage the nerves that supply nipple sensation.  If erogenous nipple sensitivity is important to the patient, this may not be the best approach.
  • Periareolar incision may be more likely to damage milk ducts.  If the patient might breast feed in the future, then this may not be the best choice.

What are the problems with the transaxillary approach?

• Only somewhat versatile:  Saline implants can be easily placed through the armpit.  However, it is difficult to place even moderate-sized silicone implants through the transaxillary incision.  It would be very difficult (if not impossible) to place tear-drop-shaped implants through this approach.  Both the subglandular and subpectoral pockets can be created through this incision.
• Not useful for most secondary surgeries:  Most of these patients will end up requiring a second set of incisions (probably at the inframammary folds.  Then, they are stuck with four incisions, rather than just two.)
• Reduced precision:  Unless complex endoscopic equipment is used to improve visualization, precision is markedly reduced.
• Usually, good aesthetics:  If the scar heals nicely, then the breast itself has no scars (until the secondary procedures).  However, some of these incisions heal thick.  Then, the patient is stuck with scars that other people will see when she wears routine clothes, such as tank tops.
• Limitations:  Many.  I don't use this technique anymore.
• • While some surgeons claim that they can place small silicone implants through transaxillary incisions, they certainly cannot get medium or large silicone implants through this approach.
  • It would be very difficult to orient tear-drop-shaped implants via the armpits.
  • Secondary surgeries can only very infrequently be performed through the under arms.  Usually, these patients will require inframammary incisions.
  • Without complex endoscopic equipment, visualization is impaired.  Could there be a greater likelihood for bleeding complications and for malpositioned implants?

Why is the transumbilical breast augmentation (TUBA) condemned?

• This is a novelty technique.  Most Board Certified Plastic Surgeons think that it is foolish.
• No versatility regarding implant type:  Only round, saline implants are possible with the TUBA.  It would be impossible to place a silicone implant or a tear-drop-shaped implant with this technique.
• No subpectoral placement:  Only subglandular placement is possible.
• Not at all useful for secondary surgeries, under any circumstances.
• Poor precision:  Most of the patients complain that at least one of the two breasts is "off to the side" or "too close to the middle."
• The scar may be invisible.  However, a secondary procedure would necessitate inframammary or periareolar scars.
• This technique is officially condemned by implant manufacturers.  Use of the TUBA approach invalidates device warranties.

Bottom lines: 

• Like my colleagues around the country, I advocate incisions at the inframammary folds and around the areolae.
• For most patients, the fold will be best, especially since silicone is becoming so much more popular than saline.
• In the unusual patient who either has constricted breasts or poorly defined folds, periareolar incisions may be better.

Breast Implants: Consideration #4: Smooth v. Textured

The shell of a breast implant can be smooth (as shown on the left) or textured (as on the right).

Biophysicists first developed texturing in their attempt to decrease capsular contractures.

• All foreign materials (whether knee replacements, artificial heart valves, or metal rods for stabilizing bones) stimulate inflammation and surrounding scar.
• • The body thinks, "What the hell is this thing?!  I need to protect myself."
  • The resultant inflammation produces the scar.
• Capsular contracture is the specific term for the scar around breast implants.
• While all breast implant patients have some degree of capsule, in 7-9% of patients the scar can be excessive. 
• • The breasts can be too firm;
  • they can be distorted;
  • they can even be painful.
• Below is a patient from Hawaii who presented to my Ventura office with severe capsular contractures.  Ouch.

Textured shells were supposed to decrease the incidence of capsules and to minimize their extent when they did form.  The rationale was that any scar formed around textured implants would be irregularly oriented, and thus less likely to become hard, firm, or distorting.

Most studies, however, have not supported this theory.  Textured implants become hard ("contracted") as often as smooth implants.

Moreover,...

• Textured implants have thicker shells.  Thus, to begin with, textured implants are a bit firmer.
• Textured implants tend to produce more rippling.

Now you know why 92% of Board Certified Plastic Surgeons in the USA use smooth implants rather than textured implants.

So, why do we ever use texturing?

• Rarely, some patients benefit from tear-drop-shaped implants.  The texturing helps to stabilize the implants so that they maintain their orientation.  (Please read my post from 3 days ago.)
• Tissue expanders used in breast reconstruction also have an "anatomic" shape.  Whenever I am treating a mastectomy patient who is interested in a prosthetic breast reconstruction, I always use textured devices to create a pocket for a permanent implant.

(By the way, the Hawaiian patient had a happy ending--albeit after a corrective surgery....)

Breast Implants: Consideration #3: Round v. Tear Drop

Breast implants can be shaped in two common configurations:

• Round (on the left)
• Tear drop (also known as, anatomical) (on the right)

Ideally, a breast itself is shaped like a tear drop...

• Its upper half is full but not protuberant.  The upper profile is straight, not round.
• Its lower half contains the bulk of the breast volume, but is not droopy.  Its profile is round but tight.
• The nipple should point parallel to the floor.  It is located at the peak of the fullness.

If the ideal breast is shaped like a tear drop, why do 96% of Board Certified Plastic Surgeons (including me) prefer round implants?

Is it that we and our patients have grown to prefer Pamela Anderson's "Baywatch breasts," which are...

• round, both in the upper and in the lower halves.
• look more like cantaloupes than tear drops.

I should hope NOT!

We prefer round implants (in the vast majority of patients) because they tend to augment the upper pole proportionately more.  The upper breast is what deflates after pregnancies, breast feeding, and menopause.  Check out Kate Winslet, who has had a couple of kids, and who acted nude in The Reader...

Not that I am pushing breast implants on Ms. Winslet, but using a non-anatomically-shaped implant would restore youthful contours more effectively.

There are at least four other major problems with shaped implants:

1. Bigger incisions:  Placing a tear-drop-shaped implant obviously requires that the upper, less protuberant part is on top, and the lower, fuller half is at the bottom.  To ensure this proper orientation, a surgeon needs a bigger incision.  Mini incisions (just 3-4 centimeters) are usually not possible; 6 cm is more typical.
2. Possibility of rotation:  If a round implant rotates around, so what?  It's round.  If a shaped implant rotates, trouble.  The protuberant part might not be at the bottom of the breast.  The resultant breast could look bizarre.  But you're thinking, "If my surgeon is good, this won't happen."  Well, that's usually true, but no guarantee.  Rotation can happen to even the most compliant patient with the best surgeon.
3. Shaped implants are always textured:  Because of the risk of rotation, the manufacturers have textured the implants, so that the tissue sticks to the implants better.  Thus, texturing does minimize rotation.  Unfortunately, texturing leads to more rippling relative to smooth surfaces.  (I will discuss the smooth v. texture issue in a few days.)
4. Shaped silicone implants are not available in the USA:  Currently, the FDA has approved tear-drop-shaped saline implants, as well as round saline and round silicone.  Tear-drop silicone implants are not available.  If you agree that silicone are superior in most cases (as I did a few days ago), then you must use round.